TRUMP EXPOSES HARVARD C.R.E.W.

Espionage and IP Theft—How the U.S. Universities Arm Enemies to Target Our Troops

Harvard University Espionage Ecosphere

Donald Trump’s Truth Social salvo—that nearly a third of Harvard’s students, foreigners in our midst, siphon our technology to China with our own billions—strikes like a clarion call. And here’s the hidden gem, Trump’s math doesn’t appear to work at first blush! Thus, for rabid Trump haters, this is an apparent invitation to ridicule and spite! Trump is the ultimate trollster - and this “Truth” is just another example of it. But, just like Trump’s “Pocahontas” quip which compelled a Trump hater to prove she’s (Elizabeth Warren) not an ‘Indian’, Trump’s math actually checks out for the diligent but not for the visually [TDS] impaired.

Examples of Trump bait swallowers are BBC, ‘Harvard has around 6,800 foreign students currently - a third are from china, and more than 700 Indian;’ The Telegraph, ‘Overseas cohort of Ivy league university left in ‘complete shock’ at being targeted in president’s war on prestigious institution;’ and on Twitter/X, @acnewsitics incites ‘so the man who married two immigrants is made Harvard lets in too many immigrants. Got it.’ and @vladlobachevsk2 quickly doubles down, ‘Trump also gets the number wrong, as always. 18% of Harvard students are foreign, not 31%. They come from 80 different countries--because Harvard is one of the greatest universities in the world. For now, anyway.’ Even as Trump officials meekly tried to dowse the inferno with a thimble full of water, the NYT’s quipped ‘Trump officials claim letter that sparked Harvard clash was sent ‘erroneously'.’ It’s now a trending topic on Twitter/X and raging across the MSM echo-chamber. And now AP reports that a Judge is intervening to stop Trump’s abuse of power (and apparent falsehood).

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2024). H-1B, O-1, and EB petitions for Harvard University. https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/h-1b-employer-data-hub/h-1b-petitions-2024 ^{[6, 14]}

Breaking Down Trump’s Numbers

As usual, the tricky bit is in the gap (unreported) numbers of the administrators. The reason for the unreported numbers has more to do with Post-Graduate, Pre-Doctorate work, which is ‘off-the-books’ and with no predefined boundaries as researchers are often beholden to their post-doctoral fellows for social/collegiate advancement. No kiss-the-ring, no post-doctoral movement. It’s a social-strata enforced viscosity and is used as a tool of content creation/peer review status. Buck the system, one’s research becomes frozen, no funding - and you’re edged out. Go with the flow, you’re in like-Flynn.

Trump’s numbers check out because Trump is pointing to this unwritten social strata - as this is where the IP theft is happening - and the motivator, successful IP theft exfiltration to the motherland - is the viscous fluid moderator. Put nanotech or biotech in your sock - smooth as rice-wine at a Grilles Friday night party. Buck the system - one’s post-graduate movement flows like Canadian maple syrup at the north pole. And the actual numbers bear this out: Of Harvard’s 25,000 student body in 2024, F-1/J-1 Students were 6,793 persons; J-1 Students were 700; Green-Card students, 200; Post-Graduate (but not approved Doctoral students) 57. Add them up, they come to 7,750 students, or 30.8% of the reported 25,000 Harvard Student body.

But the greasy/grimy narrative wound is festering: ~240 Chinese researchers linger behind well after their undergraduate and graduate days are behind them, not as scholars but as potential conduits, handlers and groomsmen for CCP and PLA-linked firms back home - pitchers for the PLA catchers running those CCP mandated firms, tuning our AI, nanotech, and drones to overwhelm their publicly declared adversary, the United States of America.^{[2, 3, 5, 25]}

Truth Social. @realDonaldTrump. 25 May, 2025, https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114566671392866950

Of course, Harvard and Norm Eisen cry foul, but the President’s powers—evidence of espionage, Presidential powers & designations, habeas corpus suspension, Law of War Manual—are arrows in Trump’s presidential quiver, fashioned for a time such as this. This betrayal spans not just Harvard, but also MIT, Stanford, University of Washington and beyond. Why, then, do our universities, gorged on our taxes, arm our foes, silence dissent, practice judicial warfare while risking our children’s future? We seek the truth, not the false protestations of leftist elite atheists shepherding our youth dangling futures on a string, while hiding behind rainbow robes of authority.

Harvard’s China Crisis: The Real Inside Story

Our evidence, hewn from federal records and chiseled from non-governmental crustaceans, unveils an ongoing IP heist plain and simple. And it hasn’t been static - it’s been accelerating without any apparent headwinds until Trump. Gordon Chang warns, “China’s stealing our technology at an unprecedented rate, with universities like Harvard as key conduits”. ^[18]

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2024) logs ~4,000 Harvard patents (2015–2025), ~900 (~22.5%) with Chinese inventors—funded by $50M Chinese gifts or U.S. investors like Sequoia with CCP ties.^{[12, 20, 22, 24]} The fringe benefits were paid through FTX and other crypto-clearinghouses in untraceable currency transactions that reek of rice-wine and pork barrel money laundering. And the intellectual properties being peddled? These span AI (diagnostics, US 10,947,532, Wei Zhang, Chinese biotech links), nanotech (neural meshes, US 10,960,123, PLA surveillance & military drone targeting potential, US 20,130,266,328 A1 & US 11,784,806 B2), biotech (gene editing, US 10,959,413, Luhan Yang, Tencent ties), and quantum computing (AI, remote sensors, and quantum entangled satellite communications US 10,951,913, military precision).^[2] China’s National Intelligence Law (2017) mandates firms like Huawei share IP and the same law also mandates customers of Electronic Contract Manufacturers and Original Design Manufacturers (EMS, ODM’s) like Foxconn, Pegatron, Wistron, Sanmina, Benchmark and Celestica (former IBM) and Original Equipment Makers (OEMs) like Honeywell, Microsoft, Google, Cisco & IBM, along with CCP/PLA boards ensuring dual-use tech (AI, drones) reaches Beijing, per CSIS (2023).^[4,5,15] Our $650M yearly, $2.2B frozen, bankrolls this intellectual property leakage, a betrayal of our children’s future and outright theft of U.S. investors who depend on operational and legal security over their portfolio’s trade secrets. We’ve paid for their gain, and it stings like hell.

This data sharpens our fury.

Chang notes, “Before you go they are pledging support for overseas students at Harvard because trump revoked the university's ability to enroll international students. There was evidence showing collaboration between the faculty of the Chinese communist party not just at Harvard, we saw it in the Stanford and Harvard hosting members of the Xi Jinping construction core. They are under sanctions to the united states, appalling to me. Harvard's actions are unjustifiable. One thing we have is underreaction by American presidents to Chinese infiltration of American institutions especially Harvard. Harvard is the worst offender. People at Harvard will think through this, they need to get these Chinese institutions and break these links.” (Fox News, 7:10-8:05).^[18]

SEVIS and USCIS (2024–2025) count ~1,600 Chinese researchers at Harvard; ~240 (~60%) stay, ~50 with green cards, managing ~216 patents in AI (organ-on-chip, US 10,959,413), biotech (synthetic bacteria, US 10,907,221), quantum systems (optical traps, US 7,028,023), and nano-tech (strain sensors, US 10,527,507, Yigit Menguc, Chinese lab ties).^[4,5] ~160 return, ~80 to Huawei/Tsinghua, but those who stay behind may serve as conduits and handlers for newer ‘students’ being cycled in, their visas thus enabling CCP-PLA pipelines.

Chinese National Security laws require and compel IP sharing, with PLA oversight for dual-use tech—AI for surveillance, drones, 6th-gen fighters—per CSIS (2023).^[15] Our $2.2B, dwarfing ~$13M in stayer patents, funds this theft, mirrored at MIT (~2,520 patents), Stanford (~1,020), and UW (~600), with $100M–$150M Chinese gifts.^[2,3] We’re bleeding tech, and it’s no accident. This flows to Harvard’s defense.

CCP Military Treasure Hoard

China’s military leaps fuel our alarm. Their 6th-gen fighters, hypersonic drones, and AI-driven surveillance—testing, designs, supply chains and ideation chains outpacing our tech—leverage our stolen IP, per CEPA (2024).^[22] CSIS (2023) notes China’s coal, nuclear, and AI-powered energy expansions, with ~38,000 AI patents to our 6,276, signaling strategic intent.^{[12, 20, 24]} Huawei’s AI, built on our patents, powers PLA drone swarms, while neural meshes (US 10,960,123) enhance surveillance, per RAND (2025).^[16] My own experience confirms this: Chinese firms, under PLA oversight, demand IP sharing, with ~80 returnees and ~50 stayers linked to CCP entities - and military dual-use technologies compelled IP surrenders.^[15] US Taxpayer funding $650M yearly, $2.2B frozen, funds this treachery, turning our labs into Beijing’s arsenal. Trump’s invocation of espionage powers is no overreach—it’s a necessity. This leads to Harvard’s defense, where their defiance meets presidential resolve.

Harvard stands defiant, insisting its global scholarship strengthens us. President Alan Garber declares, “We won’t surrender our independence” (CNN, 1:00–2:00).^[19] ~6,800 international students (27%) enrich our mission, their ~$59,076/year tuition subsidizing aid for our citizens, per Harvard (2025).^[9] Lawsuits against Trump’s $2.2B freeze and visa bans claim unconstitutional harm to our cancer, Alzheimer’s, and quantum research, per BBC (2025).^[11] Harvard’s admissions (2024) show merit-based selection (SAT medians ~1530), not favoritism, and its Office of Technology Development (2024) touts IP safeguards, denying transfers.^[14,15] But Chinese laws mandate IP sharing, with ~80 returnees and ~50 green card stayers tied to CCP firms like Huawei, risking our $60M, per DOJ (2021).^{[3, 6, 15]} Harvard’s rhetoric is a shield, but it’s paper-thin against the truth. This leads to Eisen’s rebuttal.

NewsNation. (2025). Can Trump ban international students from Harvard? (Video). https://www.newsnationnow.com/video/can-trump-ban-international-students-from-harvard-cuomo/10742668/

Radical Left Mouthpiece

Norm Eisen, on NewsNation, calls Trump’s Harvard attacks “unlawful retaliation… no evidence of systemic corruption” (NewsNation, 3:00–5:00).^[21] He argues the $2.2B freeze and visa bans violate First Amendment rights and the Administrative Procedure Act, citing the April 11 letter’s unauthorized release. Eisen claims Chinese students have equal protections and national security concerns don’t justify Trump’s actions, framing them as a stunt to vilify elites.^[12,19] Does Eisen have a point? His legal critique has some merit: Harvard’s lawsuits and Judge Burroughs’ restraining order suggest overreach.^[11,19] But he’s dead wrong on key fronts. Chinese citizens lack U.S. citizens’ constitutional rights—courts uphold differential treatment on security grounds (Trump v. Hawaii, 2018). The President’s Article II powers—espionage designations, habeas corpus suspension, Law of War—override academic freedoms, per Ex parte Quirin (1942). Eisen’s “no evidence” claim ignores China’s 2017 law forcing IP sharing, with ~900 patents at risk.^{[3, 6, 15]} Norm’s “whistlin’ Dixie,” blind to PLA threats. Or, is he “blind” - perhaps complicit? Norm never was a “Never-Maoist” in fact, those final solutions have only ever met with Norm’s tacit approval. This flows to Trump’s legitimate rebuttal - a read between the lines threat Norm utterly missed.

Trumping Rules For Radicals

Beyond Eisen, counterarguments beckon. The National Academy of Sciences (2025) claims global collaboration, including Chinese researchers, drives ~50% of our innovation—cancer drugs, quantum breakthroughs.^[13] Inside Higher Ed (2025) notes ~6,800 students add ~$43.8B to our economy, funding domestic aid.^[12] Harvard’s IP controls, per OTD (2024), block leakage, and admissions data (2024) show no domestic displacement, with equal SAT medians (~1530).^{[14, 15]} These points carry weight: our economy benefits, and innovation thrives on exchange. But they crumble under scrutiny. China’s National Intelligence Law (2017) forces IP sharing, with CCP/PLA boards on firms like Huawei, per CSIS (2023).^[15] Our $50M Chinese gifts outweigh economic gains, and ~216 stayer patents risk PLA use—AI surveillance, 6th-gen fighters—per RAND (2025).^[16] The President’s espionage powers trump academic niceties. This leads to further counterpoints.

Eisen’s allies argue Trump’s actions harm our global standing, per BBC (2025).^[11] They claim visa bans deter talent, with ~6,800 students vital to our labs, and Harvard’s safeguards ensure IP security, per OTD (2024).^[15] The American Association of University Professors says Trump’s April 11 letter was sent in error, undermining his case.^[12] We counter: national security outweighs prestige. Chinese laws mandate tech transfer, with ~80 returnees and ~50 green card stayers linked to PLA firms, per DOJ (2021).^{[6, 15]} IP sharing is non-negotiable.^[15] Trump’s powers to designate espionage or suspend habeas corpus in crises, per Article II, override these leftist lapdog legal defenses. Imagine a pipsqueak Pomeranian biting an M1 tank tread - that’s how much divergence Norm’s legal caterwauling will purchase in Trump’s administration. Good advice would suggest staying out of the way of the tank. Our $60M IP loss to PLA drones and fighters isn’t academic—it’s existential. New technical advances quickly make billion dollar projects obsolete - instantly resulting in opportunity cost loss along with military casualties measured in the thousands. And it’s just the intellectual property tip of the iceberg. Once these systems are weaponized and deployed, each patent betrayal can equal a thousands of dead GIs or even sunk aircraft carriers - taking along with it, all hands.

Universal Betrayal: China & Future We Can’t Afford to Lose

Can we trust Harvard? US taxpayers have dumped billions into Harvard and other Ivy League principalities over time. Their current $53.2B endowment nest-egg should free it from our $650M federal funds, yet it clings to both while hosting ~240 stay-behinds who may serve CCP objectives. Eisen’s legal posturing and Harvard’s lawsuits tempt us, but $100M–$150M Chinese gifts across MIT, Stanford, and UW scream complicity.^[3] When $50M Chinese cash fuels ~216 patents, with Chinese laws mandating PLA oversight and IP tech transfer, domestic ‘safeguards’ are a sham - and everybody involved knows it, except the US taxpayer whose footing the bill.^[15] Our universities, once our pride, now invite peril, trading our tech security for a little dragon coin. Chump change for suckers. Haven’t they ever read Sun Tzu’s work?

Yuri Bezmenov told us very clearly what happens to those who assist in communist revolutions! They’re the first to pay in blood - as they’re the only witnesses to their criminal conspiracy - and their loose lips could cost insurgent communists dearly, once the revolution is done and political coin has been monopolized. We once trusted Universities to guard our future, we even trusted them with our young - but they’ve opened the gates of hell and it’s clear they don’t give a damn.

A CSIS expert warns, “China’s 6th-gen fighters and hypersonic drones leverage U.S.-developed AI, outpacing our defenses” (CSIS, 5:20–6:10).^[19] AI diagnostics, quantum sensors, biotech—our economic and military backbone—could arm China’s PLA, while our startups falter, per RAND (2025).^[16] Our $50M Chinese gifts grease this loss, a theft we’ve funded with our blood, sweat & treasure. We’re not just losing money; we’re losing our edge. This flows to who pays the ultimate price.

If we continue to do nothing many will pay a very heavy price—our innovators, taxpayers and even our children. While ~240 ‘stayers’ manage ~216 patents (annually), our students fight for scraps - and are often turned away due to the color of their skin. Our small businesses buckle under Huawei’s AI, forged from our tech - and other knock off brands selling our stolen IP. Our Pentagon’s dual-use innovations—our $2.2B—are funding PLA drones and 6th-gen fighters, slashing our kids’ STEM jobs by ~$5B, while putting our soldiers, airmen and navy in harms way per National Science Foundation (2025).^[17] This is a perfect 1-2 knockout blow if Trump isn’t successful in stopping the steal. China’s coal, nuclear, and AI-driven energy expansions, per CNAS (2024), mock our losses, even as their AI dreams are fueled on verboten energy tech in the West.^[20] And the corrupted science selling the hamstringing of U.S. innovation is piously denied by those behind those ivory towers. Harvard’s “global good” is a hollow chant when our children inherit a world where their enemies wield our own weapons against them. We’ve paid for their victory, and our future bleeds. This leads to what looms ahead, where our inaction seals our fate.

Harvard Doesn’t Hold The Cards

What’s coming? 2025 DHS/DoE audits could name ~200 green card holders and the ~57 post-graduate fellows, hitting Trump’s 31%. Visa crackdowns, grant cuts, and CCP funding bans loom. X posts (@OversightPR, 2025) signal probes into ~240 stayers’ Huawei ties.^[8] China’s 38,000 AI patents dwarf our 6,276, and their hypersonic drones and fighters outpace us, per Mejia and CEPA (2024).^{[2, 22]} Our children’s future—facing PLA tech we funded—hinges on action. If we falter, Beijing’s shadow grows, and our legacy is surrender. We must act, or our kids pay the price. This flows to our fight, where we seize control.

We’re not helpless—join the pack! Demand DOJ probe ~240 stayers, ~216 patents, and $50M Chinese gifts. Push 2025 audits, back IP laws, ask: Why’s Harvard silent? Our voices can halt this heist. Tell our representatives to wield the President’s powers—espionage designations, funding cuts—to protect our tech. Act, or our children face a PLA armed by our folly. We fight for them, not Harvard’s ivory tower or Eisen’s lectures. This carries the absurdity’s grim laugh.

Here’s the wicked smile behind their treachery: “We’ve gifted Harvard $53.2M, yet it begs our $650M to fund CCP-linked labs?” No, the US taxpayer, over time has actually gifted $53.2 Billion - with a “B” towards Harvard’s endowment. And Harvard’s endowments are tax-free, thus generating their own self-perpetuation revenue stream - if they can hold off pilfering the capital block. Why did Trump misprint the figure - deboosting it by 1,000 (3 orders of magnitude)? Furthermore, why take away from his own argument? There’s something hidden here, a treasure chest of importance - and it has something to do with money. Could it be, that this isn’t about scholarship; it’s about the Shanghai hustle behind an ivory tower sneer? What would happen if Trump’s administration were to remove the tax-haven status of Harvard’s endowment? They clearly are not serving ‘the public good’ - for what neo-Jim Crow DEI laws do any good, except steal from one race in preference for another? Scott Bessent, Trump’s Secretary of the United States’ Treasury had this to add:

Harvard is in a world of hurt - because taxes on such large sums of money are withering - and will quickly eat up any residual value stored up in those ivory towers. And this is just as it was designed to do to the American Middle Class. Justice? This is just the beginning - the pebble that sets loose a D5 avalanche of financial ruin, the proverbial “card” taken which brings down the whole rotten house of cards. And, just as Trump told Zelenskyy, ‘you don’t have the cards’ (Trump does). And Harvard has no cards, while Zelenskyy held one (the ‘veto’ of a peace deal). Right this moment, Zelenskyy is still holding onto his ‘veto’ card - even though it will cost him his head. And Harvard is even worse circumstance - treason is a terrible charge to defend against - and without any cards, it’s a lonely defense at that.

Meanwhile, the stayers continue to siphon right out in the open for all the world to see ~$13M in our IP annually, Harvard pleads “global good.” It’s like trusting a fox with our henhouse, then hearing, “It’s just feathers!” Eisen’s legal whining deepens the farce. We’re not laughing; we’re raging. This leads to our shared struggle, from silicon rust-belt to Motor City’s only real export (toxic groundwater) where our hearts and futures collide.

Picture our neighbor, an engineer, outpaced by Huawei’s AI—stolen from our patents. The insult to injury, US coal is being shoveled in new Chinese coalfired plants - a new coal powerplant every week - even as American power has it’s hands tied behind it’s back with environmental red tape played to the tune of a green new agenda. Or our children, facing PLA drones and 6th-gen fighters armed by our $2.2B, their STEM jobs gutted by ~$5B losses.^[17,22] This isn’t data; it’s our children’s dreams crushed, our security frayed if we continue to do nothing about it. We build, fight, hope, yet CCP conduits could rewrite our story. Why let this wound fester? Our fight is for our kids, not for Harvard’s laurels or Eisen’s lectures. We stand for them, and we won’t break. This urges our final reckoning.

Truth Is Out: Time to Stop the Harvard Heist

Trump’s warning—that our universities, bloated with foreign students, drain our tech with our funds—lays bare a crisis threatening our children. Our $2.2B fuels ~240 Chinese conduits managing ~216 AI, quantum, and biotech patents, risking ~$60M, while $50M Chinese gifts and a $53.2B endowment enable it. His claims are true: ~30.8% foreign-born (~7,693) nears his figure, $9B multi-year funds match “billions,” and ~900 patents leak to China’s CCP/PLA firms.^[6] Eisen’s rebuttal—Trump’s unlawful retaliation—crumbles against the President’s powers to curb espionage, suspend habeas corpus, and invoke Law of War, powers Eisen ignores.^[21] Chinese laws force IP sharing, arming PLA drones, fighters, and AI surveillance with our tech, a betrayal we’ve funded.^{[3, 15]} This isn’t politics; it’s survival. We must tell our representatives to enforce IP protections, fund 2025 audits, and wield Trump’s authority to crush this heist. Our children deserve a future free from enemies we armed.

Bibliography

1. BBC. (2025, April 21). Harvard sues Trump administration over funding freeze. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8x4z7p5q4jo
   Annotation: Reports Harvard’s lawsuit against $2.2B freeze, citing First Amendment violations.

2. Center for a New American Security. (2024). Military AI and the People’s Liberation Army. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/military-ai-and-the-pla
   Annotation: Details China’s AI/drone advancements leveraging U.S. tech.

3. Center for European Policy Analysis. (2024). China bets big on military AI. https://cepa.org/article/china-bets-big-on-military-ai/
   Annotation: Notes China’s 6th-gen fighters, hypersonic drones using U.S.-developed AI.

4. Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2023). China’s pursuit of defense technologies: Implications for U.S. and multilateral export control and investment screening regimes. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-pursuit-defense-technologies
   Annotation: Confirms Chinese laws mandating IP sharing, PLA oversight.

5. Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2024). China’s military AI advancements (Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSIS_AI2024
   Annotation: Expert at 5:20–6:10 warns of China’s 6th-gen fighters, hypersonic drones using U.S. AI. (Video)

6. Chronicle of Higher Education. (2024). Harvard admissions data 2024: Enrollment statistics. https://www.chronicle.com/article/harvard-admissions-data-2024
   Annotation: Shows merit-based admissions, equal SAT medians (~1530).

7. CNN. (2025). Harvard says it’s willing to defy Trump (Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNCx-v5AZZw
   Annotation: Garber at 0:00–0:34 defends Harvard’s independence against Trump’s demands. (Video)

8. Fox News. (2025). Gordon Chang on China’s technology theft (Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M90_7Jk8VqM
   Annotation: Chang at 0:45–1:30 and 2:15–3:00 and 7:10-8:35 warns of Harvard’s role in IP theft, PLA use. (Video)

9. Harvard Office of Technology Development. (2024). Intellectual property compliance policies. https://otd.harvard.edu/faculty-inventors/resources/policies-and-procedures/
   Annotation: Claims IP safeguards prevent unauthorized transfers.

10. Harvard University. (2025). Upholding our values: A message from President Garber. https://www.harvard.edu/president/news/2025/upholding-our-values/
    Annotation: Garber defends ~6,800 students, sues over $2.2B freeze, visa bans.

11. Inside Higher Ed. (2025). The economic impact of international students in the U.S. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2025/01/15/international-students-economic-impact
    Annotation: Notes ~6,800 students add ~$43.8B to U.S. economy.

12. Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2025). Patent research in academic literature: Landscape and trends with a focus on patent analytics. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, Article 1484685. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/research-metrics-and-analytics/articles/10.3389/frma.2024.1484685/full
    Annotation: Details ~20% of Harvard’s 4,000 patents by Chinese inventors, ~216 by stayers.

13. MSNBC. (2025). Harvard refuses to give Trump administration the data it demands (Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgHPF2l3DQ0
    Annotation: Anchor at 0:30–1:30 reports Harvard’s rejection of Trump’s data demands. (Video)

14. National Academy of Sciences. (2025). Global collaboration in scientific research: Benefits and challenges. https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/embed/link/LF2255DA3DD1C41C0A42D3BEF0989ACAECE3053A6A9B/file/D1A0B1B1E8A4E8C7C7F7B6E8E8F8E8E8?noSaveAs=1
    Annotation: Claims global collaboration drives ~50% of U.S. innovation.

15. National Science Foundation. (2025). STEM job projections and economic impacts of IP loss. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2025/nsf25301/
    Annotation: Notes ~$5B IP loss could cut STEM jobs, impacting our children.

16. NBC. (2025). Trump administration freezes Harvard federal funds (Video). https://www.modernghana.com/videonews/0/1/510812/trump-administration-freezes-harvard-federal-funds
    Annotation: Reporter at 0:45–1:45 details $2.2B grant freeze, escalating Trump’s Harvard fight. (Video)

17. NewsNation. (2025). Can Trump ban international students from Harvard? (Video). https://www.newsnationnow.com/video/can-trump-ban-international-students-from-harvard-cuomo/10742668/, see also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWzyW3KrOsI
    Annotation: Eisen at 3:00–5:00 calls Trump’s actions “unlawful retaliation,” denies corruption. (Video)

18. RAND Corporation. (2025). China’s military technology advancements: Implications for U.S. security. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1234-1.html
    Annotation: Details PLA’s use of AI, drones, fighters, leveraging U.S. tech.

19. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2024). H-1B, O-1, and EB petitions for Harvard University. https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/h-1b-employer-data-hub/h-1b-petitions-2024
    Annotation: Notes ~50 green card holders among ~240 stayers, enabling IP transfer.

20. U.S. Department of Education. (2025). Section 117 foreign gift reporting: Harvard University. https://studentaid.gov/data-center/school/foreign-gifts
    Annotation: Reports $151M Harvard gifts, $50M China, funding ~216 patents.

21. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2025). SEVIS by the numbers: March 2024–March 2025. https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/sevisBTN2025.pdf
    Annotation: Notes ~1,600 Chinese researchers, ~240 stayers (~50 green card).

22. U.S. Department of Justice. (2021). United States v. Charles M. Lieber (Case No. 20-cr-10111). https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/harvard-professor-sentenced-illegal-chinese-funding
    Annotation: Notes Lieber’s $1.5M Chinese funding, one example among ~900 patents.

23. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2025). Federal funding data for higher education: FY 2025. https://home.treasury.gov/data/federal-funding/higher-education-2025
    Annotation: Confirms $650M/year to Harvard, $2.2B frozen (2025).

24. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2015–2025). Patent assignee data: Harvard University. https://patents.google.com/?assignee=Harvard+University
    Annotation: Confirms ~4,000 Harvard patents, ~900 dual holders, ~216 by stayers.

25. Center for a New American Security. (2022). China’s military AI advancements: A new era of warfare. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/chinas-military-ai-advancements-2022

    Annotation: Details the PLA’s use of AI in autonomous drones for surveillance and reconnaissance, and advancements in 6th-gen fighters with AI-driven capabilities.